The President’s Weekly Address post is also an Open News Thread. Feel free to share other news stories in the comments.
From the White House – Weekly Address
In this week’s address, the President discussed his decision to nominate Chief Judge Merrick Garland to the Supreme Court of the United States. Chief Judge Garland has earned the respect of both Democrats and Republicans through his years of public service. The President made clear that even though we are in the midst of a volatile political season, we should treat the appointment of a Supreme Court justice seriously. The President repeated his call for Republicans in the United States Senate to give Chief Judge Garland a fair hearing and a vote. The President did his job. Now Senators should do theirs and quickly move to consider the President’s nominee.
Transcript: Weekly Address: President Obama’s Supreme Court Nomination
Remarks of President Barack Obama as Delivered
Weekly Address, The White House, March 19, 2016
Hi, everybody. One of the most consequential responsibilities our Constitution grants a President is appointing a Supreme Court Justice. The men and women who sit on the Supreme Court safeguard our rights. They ensure that ours is a system of laws, not of men. And they’re given the essential task of applying the principles written into our founding documents to the most challenging questions of today.
So this is a duty I take very seriously. It requires me to set aside short-term politics in order to maintain faith with our founders. And on Wednesday, after weeks of consultations with Republicans, Democrats, and leaders across the country, I selected a nominee whose unmatched experience and integrity have earned him the respect and admiration of both parties – Chief Judge Merrick Garland.
Judge Garland grew up in my hometown of Chicago, with parents who taught him to work hard and deal fairly. As a young lawyer, he left a lucrative private firm to work for half as much in public service. Eventually, he oversaw the federal response to the Oklahoma City bombing, working side-by-side with first responders, victims, and their families to bring justice for an unspeakable crime. And everywhere he went during that investigation, he carried with him in his briefcase the program from the memorial service with each of the victims’ names inside.
For the last 19 years, Judge Garland has served on what’s known as “the second highest court in the land” – the D.C. Circuit Court – including the last three years as Chief Judge. On the bench, he’s shown a dedication to protecting our basic rights. A conviction that powerful voices must not be allowed to drown out those of everyday Americans. An understanding that justice isn’t simply abstract legal theory; it affects people’s daily lives. And a spirit of decency, modesty, and even-handedness in his work. Judge Garland is admired for his courtesy, his devotion to family, and his civic-mindedness – for the past 18 years, he’s served as a tutor for young students at a local D.C. elementary school.
During my time as President, through three separate Supreme Court appointments, in conversations with Republicans and Democrats alike, one name came up more than any other – Merrick Garland.
I understand that we’re in the middle of an especially noisy and volatile political season. But at a time when our politics are so polarized; when norms and customs of our political rhetoric seem to be corroding – this is precisely the time we should treat the appointment of a Supreme Court justice with the seriousness it deserves. Because our Supreme Court is supposed to be above politics, not an extension of politics. And it should stay that way.
So I ask Republicans in the Senate to give Judge Garland the respect he has earned. Give him a hearing. Give him an up-or-down vote. To deny it would be an abdication of the Senate’s Constitutional duty. It would indicate a process for nominating and confirming judges that is beyond repair. It would make it increasingly impossible for any President, Republican or Democrat, to carry out their Constitutional function. To go down that path would jeopardize our system of justice, it would hurt our democracy, and betray the vision of our founding.
I fulfilled my Constitutional duty. Now it’s time for Senators to do theirs. I hope that they take the time to reflect on the importance of this process to our country. I hope that they’ll act fairly. And I hope they’ll work in a bipartisan fashion to confirm Merrick Garland to the Supreme Court. That’s how we can uphold our pledge to liberty and justice for all – for our time and for generations to come.
Thanks everybody. Have a good weekend.
Motley Moose coverage of the nomination and reaction can be found here:
President Obama announces his Supreme Court nominee, Chief Judge Merrick Garland of the DC Circuit
Sen. Charles Grassley’s obstructionism is not much appreciated in Iowa:
He also now has a formidable opponent in the fall election who has state-wide name recognition, in fact whose very name, Patty Judge, will remind voters of Grassley’s blatantly partisan rejection of his constitutional duty.
The battle is joined:
In the News: Go home librul, and take yer librul idears with you!!!
Well, bless his heart. I guess “go back to Illinois” is the new “go back to Africa” but for white people.
Thanks for this, Jan. The President is right. The people spoke in 2012, when we elected him for another FOUR years, not three. It is his duty to nominate a judge and the Senate’s duty to confirm.
I hope the Dems constantly point to Rethug obstruction and intransigence in their commercials this fall. And I hope the people listen.
Well, the silliest thing from all of this is the notion that President Obama will keep the nomination open until the election and then allow the Republican Senators an escape hatch.
Sen. Patrick Leahy already signaled that the process should be wrapped up by Memorial Day. If it is not, and surely by Labor Day, expect the president to withdraw the nomination. Judge Garland has an important job on the DC Circuit that he needs to get back to and keeping the nomination open would politicize the entire process.
In the News: Maybe it is time to make climate change a campaign issue?
Climate Change: another thing that makes Republicans wildly out of touch with the rest of America.
In the News: Chance for a Democratic House? Probably still out of reach, but reason for Republicans to start worrying.
Cook has shifted ratings on 10 seats to more favorable for Democrats. Any pickups that make the margin closer would give us more leverage in the House.
In the News: NFL may reject Atlanta Super Bowl bid over anti-gay religious “liberty” law:
The bill has passed the Georgia House and Senate and is on Gov. Nathan Deal’s desk.
In stopped-clock news, George Will pens an op-ed calling the GOP position incoherent:
Why, Georgy-Porgy, this comes as the biggest surprise in the fruit salad of my life!
In the News: Sunday, the president visits Cuba …
The White House posts “Engaging the Cuban People: Here’s What President Obama Will Be Doing in Cuba”
More information and photos at the link.
Yay, President Obama! And buenas dias, nos amigos Cubanos!
Please excuse my awful Spanish. But you know what I mean.
Thoughtful and sad, really, piece by Paul Waldman in The Week:
Cool photo from Reuter’s Photos of the Week slide show: