VNV Tuesday – Speaking Their Truths, SOTU Edition 1/30/18

Does anyone want to predict what words would appear in a word cloud of tonight’s address?

Tonight’s the night, and I, for one, will either be locked in my sewing room finishing a project or sitting down to write a letter to my cousin (because some of us still do that!) The report on the state of the union may be constitutionally-mandated…

He shall from time to time give to the Congress Information of the State of the Union, and recommend to their Consideration such Measures as he shall judge necessary and expedient

…but this is one instance where I wish the pre- radio and television practice of submitting a written report to Congress was once again the norm. In the past, these reports were often a recitation of the status of various government departments, as well as a Treasury update, and as a result, are rarely remembered in the same way as inauguration speeches. What follows is a random sampling from previous SOTU reports: some notable, some not, and some that should be.

Excerpts from President George Washington’s 1790 address to Congress

…Nor am I less persuaded that you will agree with me in opinion that there is nothing which can better deserve your patronage than the promotion of science and literature. Knowledge is in every country the surest basis of public happiness. In one in which the measures of government receive their impressions so immediately from the sense of the community as in ours it is proportionably essential.
To the security of a free constitution it contributes in various ways – by convincing those who are intrusted with the public administration that every valuable end of government is best answered by the enlightened confidence of the people, and by teaching the people themselves to know and to value their own rights; to discern and provide against invasions of them; to distinguish between oppression and the necessary exercise of lawful authority; between burthens proceeding from a disregard to their convenience and those resulting from the inevitable exigencies of society; to discriminate the spirit of liberty from that of licentiousness – cherishing the first, avoiding the last – and uniting a speedy but temperate vigilance against encroachments, with an inviolable respect to the laws.

(Citation: George Washington: “First Annual Address to Congress,” January 8, 1790. Online by Gerhard Peters and John T. Woolley, The American Presidency Project. Full text here)

James Monroe’s seventh address to Congress (December 2, 1823); the Monroe Doctrine articulated

…the occasion has been judged proper for asserting, as a principle in which the rights and interests of the United States are involved, that the American continents, by the free and independent condition which they have assumed and maintain, are henceforth not to be considered as subjects for future colonization by any European powers.

We owe it, therefore, to candor and to the amicable relations existing between the United States and those powers to declare that we should consider any attempt on their part to extend their system to any portion of this hemisphere as dangerous to our peace and safety. With the existing colonies or dependencies of any European power we have not interfered and shall not interfere, but with the Governments who have declared their independence and maintained it, and whose independence we have, on great consideration and on just principles, acknowledged, we could not view any interposition for the purpose of oppressing them, or controlling in any other manner their destiny, by any European power in any other light than as the manifestation of an unfriendly disposition toward the United States.

(Citation: James Monroe: “Seventh Annual Message,” December 2, 1823. Online by Gerhard Peters and John T. Woolley, The American Presidency Project. Full text here)

Andrew Jackson’s first address (December 8, 1829) on the status of “Indians” and a call for what became the Indian Removal Act (1830)

The condition and ulterior destiny of the Indian tribes within the limits of some of our States have become objects of much interest and importance. It has long been the policy of Government to introduce among them the arts of civilization, in the hope of gradually reclaiming them from a wandering life. This policy has, however, been coupled with another wholly incompatible with its success. Professing a desire to civilize and settle them, we have at the same time lost no opportunity to purchase their lands and thrust them farther into the wilderness. By this means they have not only been kept in a wandering state, but been led to look upon us as unjust and indifferent to their fate. Thus, though lavish in its expenditures upon the subject, Government has constantly defeated its own policy, and the Indians in general, receding farther and farther to the west, have retained their savage habits. A portion, however, of the Southern tribes, having mingled much with the whites and made some progress in the arts of civilized life, have lately attempted to erect an independent government within the limits of Georgia and Alabama. These States, claiming to be the only sovereigns within their territories, extended their laws over the Indians, which induced the latter to call upon the United States for protection.

…As a means of effecting this end I suggest for your consideration the propriety of setting apart an ample district west of the Mississippi, and without the limits of any State or Territory now formed, to be guaranteed to the Indian tribes as long as they shall occupy it, each tribe having a distinct control over the portion designated for its use. There they may be secured in the enjoyment of governments of their own choice, subject to no other control from the United States than such as may be necessary to preserve peace on the frontier and between the several tribes. There the benevolent may endeavor to teach them the arts of civilization, and, by promoting union and harmony among them, to raise up an interesting commonwealth, destined to perpetuate the race and to attest the humanity and justice of this Government.

This emigration should be voluntary, for it would be as cruel as unjust to compel the aborigines to abandon the graves of their fathers and seek a home in a distant land. But they should be distinctly informed that if they remain within the limits of the States they must be subject to their laws. In return for their obedience as individuals they will without doubt be protected in the enjoyment of those possessions which they have improved by their industry.

But it seems to me visionary to suppose that in this state of things claims can be allowed on tracts of country on which they have neither dwelt nor made improvements, merely because they have seen them from the mountain or passed them in the chase. Submitting to the laws of the States, and receiving, like other citizens, protection in their persons and property, they will ere long become merged in the mass of our population.
(Citation: Andrew Jackson: “First Annual Message,” December 8, 1829. Online by Gerhard Peters and John T. Woolley, The American Presidency Project. Full text here

James Polk in his fourth address (December 5, 1848) triggers the California gold rush

It was known that mines of the precious metals existed to a considerable extent in California at the time of its acquisition. Recent discoveries render it probable that these mines are more extensive and valuable than was anticipated. The accounts of the abundance of gold in that territory are of such an extraordinary character as would scarcely command belief were they not corroborated by the authentic reports of officers in the public service who have visited the mineral district and derived the facts which they detail from personal observation. Reluctant to credit the reports in general circulation as to the quantity of gold, the officer commanding our forces in California visited the mineral district in July last for the purpose of obtaining accurate information on the subject. His report to the War Department of the result of his examination and the facts obtained on the spot is herewith laid before Congress. When he visited the country there were about 4,000 persons engaged in collecting gold. There is every reason to believe that the number of persons so employed has since been augmented. The explorations already made warrant the belief that the supply is very large and that gold is found at various places in an extensive district of country…

…The effects produced by the discovery of these rich mineral deposits and the success which has attended the labors of those who have resorted to them have produced a surprising change in the state of affairs in California. Labor commands a most exorbitant price, and all other pursuits but that of searching for the precious metals are abandoned. Nearly the whole of the male population of the country have gone to the gold districts. Ships arriving on the coast are deserted by their crews and their voyages suspended for want of sailors. Our commanding officer there entertains apprehensions that soldiers can not be kept in the public service without a large increase of pay. Desertions in his command have become frequent, and he recommends that those who shall withstand the strong temptation and remain faithful should be rewarded.

(Citation: James K. Polk: “Fourth Annual Message,” December 5, 1848. Online by Gerhard Peters and John T. Woolley, The American Presidency Project. Full text here)

Franklin Pierce, often considered one of the worst presidents, in his fourth address (December 2, 1856) disparages “sectionalism” and those who support the abolition of slavery

Perfect liberty of association for political objects and the widest scope of discussion are the received and ordinary conditions of government in our country. Our institutions, framed in the spirit of confidence in the intelligence and integrity of the people, do not forbid citizens, either individually or associated together, to attack by writing, speech, or any other methods short of physical force the Constitution and the very existence of the Union. Under the shelter of this great liberty, and protected by the laws and usages of the Government they assail, associations have been formed in some of the States of individuals who, pretending to seek only to prevent the spread of the institution of slavery into the present or future inchoate States of the Union, are really inflamed with desire to change the domestic institutions of existing States. To accomplish their objects they dedicate themselves to the odious task of depreciating the government organization which stands in their way and of calumniating with indiscriminate invective not only the citizens of particular States with whose laws they find fault, but all others of their fellow citizens throughout the country who do not participate with them in their assaults upon the Constitution, framed and adopted by our fathers, and claiming for the privileges it has secured and the blessings it has conferred the steady support and grateful reverence of their children. They seek an object which they well know to be a revolutionary one. They are perfectly aware that the change in the relative condition of the white and black races in the slaveholding States which they would promote is beyond their lawful authority; that to them it is a foreign object; that it can not be effected by any peaceful instrumentality of theirs; that for them and the States of which they are citizens the only path to its accomplishment is through burning cities, and ravaged fields, and slaughtered populations, and all there is most terrible in foreign complicated with civil and servile war; and that the first step in the attempt is the forcible disruption of a country embracing in its broad bosom a degree of liberty and an amount of individual and public prosperity to which there is no parallel in history, and substituting in its place hostile governments, driven at once and inevitably into mutual devastation and fratricidal carnage, transforming the now peaceful and felicitous brotherhood into a vast permanent camp of armed men like the rival monarchies of Europe and Asia. Well knowing that such, and such only, are the means and the consequences of their plans and purposes, they endeavor to prepare the people of the United States for civil war by doing everything in their power to deprive the Constitution and the laws of moral authority and to undermine the fabric of the Union by appeals to passion and sectional prejudice, by indoctrinating its people with reciprocal hatred, and by educating them to stand face to face as enemies, rather than shoulder to shoulder as friends.

(Citation: Franklin Pierce: “Fourth Annual Message,” December 2, 1856. Online by Gerhard Peters and John T. Woolley, The American Presidency Project. Full text here)

Grover Cleveland, first message of his first term (December 8, 1885) on the “Chinese question.” The Chinese Exclusion Act had been signed in 1882 by Chester Arthur; Cleveland would support and sign the Scott Act (1888) which expanded the act.

The condition of the Chinese question in the Western States and Territories is, despite this restrictive legislation, far from being satisfactory. The recent outbreak in Wyoming Territory, where numbers of unoffending Chinamen, indisputably within the protection of the treaties and the law, were murdered by a mob, and the still more recent threatened outbreak of the same character in Washington Territory, are fresh in the minds of all, and there is apprehension lest the bitterness of feeling against the Mongolian race on the Pacific Slope may find vent in similar lawless demonstrations. All the power of this Government should be exerted to maintain the amplest good faith toward China in the treatment of these men, and the inflexible sternness of the law in bringing the wrongdoers to justice should be insisted upon.

Every effort has been made by this Government to prevent these violent outbreaks and to aid the representatives of China in their investigation of these outrages; and it is but just to say that they are traceable to the lawlessness of men not citizens of the United States engaged in competition with Chinese laborers.

Race prejudice is the chief factor in originating these disturbances, and it exists in a large part of our domain, jeopardizing our domestic peace and the good relationship we strive to maintain with China.

The admitted right of a government to prevent the influx of elements hostile to its internal peace and security may not be questioned, even where there is no treaty stipulation on the subject. That the exclusion of Chinese labor is demanded in other countries where like conditions prevail is strongly evidenced in the Dominion of Canada, where Chinese immigration is now regulated by laws more exclusive than our own. If existing laws are inadequate to compass the end in view, I shall be prepared to give earnest consideration to any further remedial measures, within the treaty limits, which the wisdom of Congress may devise.
(Citation: Grover Cleveland: “First Annual Message (first term),” December 8, 1885. Online by Gerhard Peters and John T. Woolley, The American Presidency Project. Full text here)

Woodrow Wilson, first address (December 2, 1913) and the first time actually delivered as a speech to Congress since John Adams in 1800; he also dispensed with the tradition of departmental reviews.

The country, I am thankful to say, is at peace with all the world, and many happy manifestations multiply about us of a growing cordiality and sense of community of interest among the nations, foreshadowing an age of settled peace and good will. More and more readily each decade do the nations manifest their willingness to bind themselves by solemn treaty to the processes of peace, the processes of frankness and fair concession…

These are all matters of vital domestic concern, and besides them, outside the charmed circle of our own national life in which our affections command us, as well as our consciences, there stand out our obligations toward our territories over sea. Here we are trustees. Porto Rico, Hawaii, the Philippines, are ours, indeed, but not ours to do what we please with. Such territories, once regarded as mere possessions, are no longer to be selfishly exploited; they are part of the domain of public conscience and of serviceable and enlightened statesmanship. We must administer them for the people who live in them and with the same sense of responsibility to them as toward our own people in our domestic affairs. No doubt we shall successfully enough bind Porto Rico and the Hawaiian Islands to ourselves by ties of justice and interest and affection, but the performance of our duty toward the Philippines is a more difficult and debatable matter. We can satisfy the obligations of generous justice toward the people of Porto Rico by giving them the ample and familiar rights and privileges accorded our own citizens in our own territories and our obligations toward the people of Hawaii by perfecting the provisions for self-government already granted them, but in the Philippines we must go further. We must hold steadily in view their ultimate independence, and we must move toward the time of that independence as steadily as the way can be cleared and the foundations thoughtfully and permanently laid.
(Citation: Woodrow Wilson: “First Annual Message,” December 2, 1913. Online by Gerhard Peters and John T. Woolley, The American Presidency Project. Full text here)

Herbert Hoover, first address (December 3, 1929) less than two months after Black Friday

The country has enjoyed a large degree of prosperity and sound progress during the past year with a steady improvement in methods of production and distribution and consequent advancement in standards of living. Progress has, of course, been unequal among industries, and some, such as coal, lumber, leather, and textiles, still lag behind. The long upward trend of fundamental progress, however, gave rise to over-optimism as to profits, which translated itself into a wave of uncontrolled speculation in securities, resulting in the diversion of capital from business to the stock market and the inevitable crash. The natural consequences have been a reduction in the consumption of luxuries and semi-necessities by those who have met with losses, and a number of persons thrown temporarily out of employment. Prices of agricultural products dealt in upon the great markets have been affected in sympathy with the stock crash…

…I have, therefore, instituted systematic, voluntary measures of cooperation with the business institutions and with State and municipal authorities to make certain that fundamental businesses of the country shall continue as usual, that wages and therefore consuming power shall not be reduced, and that a special effort shall be made to expand construction work in order to assist in equalizing other deficits in employment. Due to the enlarged sense of cooperation and responsibility which has grown in the business world during the past few years the response has been remarkable and satisfactory. We have canvassed the Federal Government and instituted measures of prudent expansion in such work that should be helpful, and upon which the different departments will make some early recommendations to Congress.

I am convinced that through these measures we have reestablished confidence. Wages should remain stable. A very large degree of industrial unemployment and suffering which would otherwise have occurred has been prevented. Agricultural prices have reflected the returning confidence. The measures taken must be vigorously pursued until normal conditions are restored.
(Citation: Herbert Hoover: “Annual Message to Congress on the State of the Union,” December 3, 1929. Online by Gerhard Peters and John T. Woolley, The American Presidency Project. Full text here)

FDRs 1941 address (January 6, 1941), known for his pronouncement of the four essential human freedoms; however, I am highlighting other areas of his speech.

Even when the World War broke out in 1914, it seemed to contain only small threat of danger to our own American future. But, as time went on, the American people began to visualize what the downfall of democratic nations might mean to our own democracy.

We need not overemphasize imperfections in the Peace of Versailles. We need not harp on failure of the democracies to deal with problems of world reconstruction. We should remember that the Peace of 1919 was far less unjust than the kind of “pacification” which began even before Munich, and which is being carried on under the new order of tyranny that seeks to spread over every continent today. The American people have unalterably set their faces against that tyranny.

Every realist knows that the democratic way of life is at this moment being’ directly assailed in every part of the world—assailed either by arms, or by secret spreading of poisonous propaganda by those who seek to destroy unity and promote discord in nations that are still at peace.
During sixteen long months this assault has blotted out the whole pattern of democratic life in an appalling number of independent nations, great and small. The assailants are still on the march, threatening other nations, great and small.

Therefore, as your President, performing my constitutional duty to “give to the Congress information of the state of the Union,” I find it, unhappily, necessary to report that the future and the safety of our country and of our democracy are overwhelmingly involved in events far beyond our borders.
(Citation: Franklin D. Roosevelt: “Annual Message to Congress on the State of the Union,” January 6, 1941. Online by Gerhard Peters and John T. Woolley, The American Presidency Project. Full text here)

  6 comments for “VNV Tuesday – Speaking Their Truths, SOTU Edition 1/30/18

  1. bfitzinAR
    January 30, 2018 at 9:52 am

    {{{DoReMI}}} – Bless you for reading this stuff – some of it I can and some of it I can’t. Not because of the evil inherent although that does factor in, but the “verbosity” of some of the speakers/writers turned it into word salad by about 3 sentences in. Washington’s words, taken by themselves and forgetting the “understood” racial and gender restrictions, are quite good and true. Education is the key to whether or not a people become or remain as free as is possible in a social setting. Between Washington’s admirable call for funding and supporting “science and literature” and FDR’s somber reminder that our future and safety was completely wrapped up in events beyond our borders was a bunch of stuff that as best I could make out and understand could be most politely considered self-serving bull pucky. From the deadly attitudes about Natives and black folks (with a slight nod to Wilson’s attitude towards Puerto Rico – one that obviously was not followed through on) to the anti-government “voluntary measures” as response to depressions there was not a single concept that did not at the expense of ordinary working people preserve an oppressive, genocidal, elitist white first, male second supremacist system. Forsooth their “truths” were lies in very deed.

    Again bless you for doing the work on this. moar {{{HUGS}}}

    • DoReMI
      January 30, 2018 at 10:50 am

      Thank you, bfitz. I read more than 40 SOTU addresses before deciding which excerpts to include…not so much because I found them all fascinating, but because I seem unable to resist falling down rabbit holes!

      When I first considered this topic, I thought I would be doing an inspirational, cheerleading sort of post, but the more I read, the more I realized that (for me at least) sobering truths about who we have been actually provide some necessary perspective about the actions and immorality of the Current Occupant. I’ve come to believe that the true definition of American exceptionalism is more about our ability to ignore our white supremacist history and instead create self-serving myths. By his very stupidity (and I do think he’s stupid; clever in serving his own interests, but still so incurious as to be stupid), 45* is tearing the veil away from what we thought we were. Not for his base, of course, but for those who consider themselves “apolitical,” it’s becoming harder to pretend this is something new, rather than just an “out” version of our history.

      • bfitzinAR
        January 30, 2018 at 5:21 pm

        Yeah. Between them DOV and Aji have stripped away most of the illusions I had – and I didn’t have all that many thanks to my mother’s teaching. We’ve made progress from where we were in the beginning – but not as much as we pretended and we were so very far down into the pit of evil at the beginning that the progress we’ve made isn’t exactly something to congratulate ourselves on. More something to be ashamed we weren’t there and beyond in the first place. I mean “oh we’re not actively committing genocide on Natives and chattel slavery is no longer legal” is not something to pat oneself on the back for. We’ve got such a long way to go. and the folks currently in power want us to go back not forward. So I volunteer for the Dem Party and make my small donations and – pray a lot.

  2. WYgalinCali
    January 30, 2018 at 10:27 am

    Good morning, Pond Dwellers and thanks for the dual posting, DoReMi. I’d say that our current POS is more like Cleveland but the darkness of our times is more FDR like. However, one thing they both share is that as a country, we survived. We will survive this too. Also, the NY AG isn’t subject to federal law. He’s going after the money launderers so he might take down the first family himself.

    Back to the 🍊and more Java.

  3. Batch
    January 30, 2018 at 11:13 am

    Morning meese…Thanks Sher…Always love your history lessons…You still write letters? :)

    Presidents over the years , some good some full of themselves, are always worth the reading to understand where we have come from and why we shouldn’t be frenetically screaming the sky is falling…

    • DoReMI
      January 30, 2018 at 11:41 am

      I love writing letters almost as much as I like receiving them. I do it less and less these days, but this particular cousin doesn’t do social media. We’ve been exchanging information on family stories related to our family tree by snail mail…and I promptly scan his letters, because he may prefer to be off the social media grid, but that’s now how I usually work.

Comments are closed.